“In the lurch for $374,000,” thanks to Cash for Clunkers

Didn’t you love it when Barack Obama accidentally sang the virtues of UPS and FedEx whilst decrying the mediocrity of the post office this week?  You know, talked about how poorly a government bureaucracy does with a job that private industry does well?

I love it as context for this.  Henry Payne wrote a lot of brilliance at Planet Gore today on how well that whole Cash for Clunkers thing is working.  I’m quoting a hell of a lot of this with very little added content; just consider it a testimony to the excellence of what he wrote.  Go with me on this.  Read:

The clunkers law signed by President Obama requires that dealers be reimbursed by the government within ten days for the $3,500 to $4,500 credits they’ve paid to customers. The DOT says it’s working through computer problems.

“Very few dealers are getting very little money,” said Bob Israel, president of the Louisiana Automobile Dealers Association. “It’s not working smoothly at all.”

David Wilson, a Toyota dealer in Orange County, Calif., has been paid for only three of 92 claims he submitted before Aug. 2, leaving him in the lurch for $374,000.

North Carolina’s Brad Wood has 12 unpaid claims since Aug. 1. He’s received just $26,000 of the $319,000 in rebates he is owed. “I’ve never experienced anxiety like this in business before,” he says. “If I don’t get paid, I will have been working almost free for several months.”

National Auto Dealers Assoc. (NADA) spokesman Bailey Wood said dealers are “angry and nervous. They’re getting fed up with the program.”

And there are other problems. First, NHTSA demanded that all clunkers engines be immediately destroyed by running sodium silicate through them to satisfy green zealots that the planet-offending devils have been permanently removed from the road. But dealers got that rule changed after the first week as it became apparent that the clunkers claims wouldn’t be processed for weeks and some might be rejected — meaning they’d have to give their customers their cars back. In running order.

Fearful of these and other legal ramifications, says Michigan dealer Fox, the NADA drew up a form for all customers to sign informing them that dealers are not liable if the feds (whenever they get around to it) reject their clunker. But NHTSA — under pressure from consumer activists this time — is now instructing customers not to sign the form, leaving dealers exposed financially and causing more irritation with the program.

Many deals are also are getting rejections for procedural minutiae that they can’t straighten out because the 200 employees DOT has allocated program aren’t enough. Employees are inaccessible by phone or e-mail, NADA’s Wood says. The problem? Unlike the IRS, for example, which doesn’t audit every tax form, all clunkers applications must be reviewed. That’s 315,000 forms so far (for a staff of 200). Washington is scrambling to boost the number of employees to 1,000, but that will cost more money in a program already tight for cash.

Everybody ready for government health insurance and government-run national health connectors now?

Heh.  I’m sure it will be fine.  After all, if you’re opposed to it, you’re just an agitator full of manufactured outrage.

Be Sociable, Share!

• 

Possibly related posts (automatically generated):

1. Cash for Clunkers: Our Betters’ latest war on the poor So you know about Cash for Clunkers, the federal program with which you can trade a qualifying used vehicle for a $3,500 or $4,500 credit...
2. Climategate heats up… …and I’m pretty sure it’s anthropogenic.  Heh. Since our last action-packed episode—hacked emails and reports detailing doubts, destruction of evidence, conspiracy to sabotage peer reviews,...
3. More on the tasty sausages our esteemed Senate is making It is the only major piece of social policy legislation in American history that has no bipartisan support, and no popular support. Even the hard...
4. “They push the health care on the NBC…” Genius.  Hat tip, NHFalcon. Y’all spread this on your own blogs and Facebook and what-not.  This isn’t getting the exposure it deserves....
5. Fat guy sues White Castle because seats are too small Martin Kessman has decided that weighing 290 lbs. and not being able to sit comfortably at a White Castle table is a violation of the...