<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Aliens vs. Predator: Requiem, and the state of the Alien franchise in general</title>
	<atom:link href="http://bowilliams.com/2009/04/aliens-vs-predator-requiem-and-the-state-of-the-alien-franchise-in-general/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://bowilliams.com/2009/04/aliens-vs-predator-requiem-and-the-state-of-the-alien-franchise-in-general/</link>
	<description>Rarely senselessly vulgar; frequently slightly tacky</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 01:08:13 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Thursday miscellanea #39 &#124; WmWms</title>
		<link>http://bowilliams.com/2009/04/aliens-vs-predator-requiem-and-the-state-of-the-alien-franchise-in-general/comment-page-1/#comment-23931</link>
		<dc:creator>Thursday miscellanea #39 &#124; WmWms</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 May 2009 12:56:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wmwmsblog.com/?p=1918#comment-23931</guid>
		<description>[...] speculated here, and it looks like there may be a gear or two turning:  Fox is considering rebooting Alien.  [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] speculated here, and it looks like there may be a gear or two turning:  Fox is considering rebooting Alien.  [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bo</title>
		<link>http://bowilliams.com/2009/04/aliens-vs-predator-requiem-and-the-state-of-the-alien-franchise-in-general/comment-page-1/#comment-20570</link>
		<dc:creator>Bo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Apr 2009 04:59:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wmwmsblog.com/?p=1918#comment-20570</guid>
		<description>That is by far the most glowing review of AVP:R I&#039;ve read.  Still, they share some of my rhetoric on it:  it&#039;s not high cinema, it&#039;s candy.  It&#039;s &lt;i&gt;not&lt;/i&gt; a waste of time in my view; just understand what you&#039;re getting.

The film &quot;reboot&quot; is in vogue right now.  I wonder if anyone&#039;s tried a partial reboot?  Any full-scale, big-budget, A-list Alien movie would just about have to be a sequel to Aliens, ignoring from Alien³ on.  &#039;Course, Sigourney Weaver will be 60 this year, and she still looks great, but 1986 was a long time ago.  I guess there&#039;s no hope for such a prospect.  Or, it could be a sequel to Alien³, leaving Ripley dead...but nah, still no hope for such a prospect.  What we&#039;re getting now is probably as good as it gets.

Ellen Ripley remains one of my favorite movie badasses of all time.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That is by far the most glowing review of AVP:R I&#8217;ve read.  Still, they share some of my rhetoric on it:  it&#8217;s not high cinema, it&#8217;s candy.  It&#8217;s <i>not</i> a waste of time in my view; just understand what you&#8217;re getting.</p>
<p>The film &#8220;reboot&#8221; is in vogue right now.  I wonder if anyone&#8217;s tried a partial reboot?  Any full-scale, big-budget, A-list Alien movie would just about have to be a sequel to Aliens, ignoring from Alien³ on.  &#8216;Course, Sigourney Weaver will be 60 this year, and she still looks great, but 1986 was a long time ago.  I guess there&#8217;s no hope for such a prospect.  Or, it could be a sequel to Alien³, leaving Ripley dead&#8230;but nah, still no hope for such a prospect.  What we&#8217;re getting now is probably as good as it gets.</p>
<p>Ellen Ripley remains one of my favorite movie badasses of all time.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: BamaDan</title>
		<link>http://bowilliams.com/2009/04/aliens-vs-predator-requiem-and-the-state-of-the-alien-franchise-in-general/comment-page-1/#comment-20559</link>
		<dc:creator>BamaDan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Apr 2009 02:37:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wmwmsblog.com/?p=1918#comment-20559</guid>
		<description>DVD Verdict begs to differ:

http://www.dvdverdict.com/reviews/listing/top100discs.php

They were probably high...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>DVD Verdict begs to differ:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.dvdverdict.com/reviews/listing/top100discs.php" rel="nofollow">http://www.dvdverdict.com/reviews/listing/top100discs.php</a></p>
<p>They were probably high&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

